jacflash.livejournal.com ([identity profile] jacflash.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] topaz 2008-10-02 01:46 pm (UTC)

The fact that we might like a provision doesn't mean that a) it wasn't added to draw votes for the main provisions in the bill or b) that it's relevant to or even a plus for the bill's larger goals.

It will cost money, it's addressed at a special interest group, and the bill includes no mechanism to fund it. That's kind of a textbook definition of "pork", even if we find it tasty. (Mmm, bacon.)

BTW, I've been in the AMT morass since 2000, so no need to convince me of the problem.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org