Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
topaz: (Default)
[personal profile] topaz

61.54 miles, originally uploaded by qwrrty.

The first rule of riding over the Sagamore Bridge is that you DO NOT
RIDE over the Sagamore Bridge.

Date: 2010-06-19 04:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mpacket.livejournal.com
I bike in California but visit family on Cape Cod each summer. So ummm, why doesn't a person bike over the Sag?

Date: 2010-06-19 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pancua.livejournal.com
I'm curious too!

Date: 2010-06-19 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keyne.livejournal.com
As the route handout says, it is both "illegal and dangerous" to bike across.

Date: 2010-06-19 08:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mpacket.livejournal.com
Is it really? (No route handouts over here on this coast) I biked over the Bourne Bridge a few times but not as part of any organized race.

Date: 2010-06-19 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keyne.livejournal.com
See above. Heavy traffic, no pedestrian walkway....

Date: 2010-06-19 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keyne.livejournal.com
You can find the route handout same place I did, at http://www.outriders.org/about/theroute.html :-)

Date: 2010-06-20 03:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aroraborealis.livejournal.com
It's a high speed bridge with no breakdown lane, so it's not safe for cyclists to share the lane, and there's no protected space for bikes on the roadway. There's a (relatively narrow) sidewalk on only one side. State law doesn't prohibit biking on sidewalks, though, so it's interesting that folks were encouraged to walk their bikes.

Date: 2010-06-20 04:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mpacket.livejournal.com
Well now I get it, thanks. I always rode on the sidewalk when crossing the Bourne Bridge. Wasn't sure why it was considered dangerous but now I see they're talking about the road.

Date: 2010-06-20 08:52 pm (UTC)
ext_86356: (Default)
From: [identity profile] qwrrty.livejournal.com
The ride organizers prohibit (for the purpose of this event) riding on the sidewalk over the Sagamore Bridge because it's a narrow walkway with a very high curb, and the only walkway on the bridge is on the left hand side, ie facing prevailing traffic. A rider on the walkway who slipped off into the road would suddenly find themselves in the middle of extremely busy 40-50mph traffic coming the other direction. In this case it's really a sensible rule.

Date: 2010-06-21 12:56 am (UTC)
ext_86356: (Default)
From: [identity profile] qwrrty.livejournal.com
See below: the way the sidewalk is arranged makes it a sudden-death proposition if you drop into traffic. It's a restriction that makes sense in this instance. I don't know if it's actually backed up by state law, though.

Date: 2010-06-21 02:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aroraborealis.livejournal.com
There are lots of places where it's illegal to be on the sidewalk, per local ordinances (often squares and such). And whether it's illegal or not, it sounds like a good rule here!

May 2018

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930 31  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Mar. 5th, 2026 03:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios