Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Date: 2010-08-04 09:54 pm (UTC)
dot_fennel: (Default)
From: [personal profile] dot_fennel
Wow!

Reading the decision in as much detail as possible (my eyes did glaze over a little), it sounds as though the pro-8 side could barely find anyone to support them, and so didn't present much of a case. The formal defendants in the government all bowed out; the intervening defendants dropped most of their witnesses, two of whom had their depositions entered by THE OTHER SIDE because they had in fact said only things that supported same-sex marriage...

And it's nice to see the arguments about gay marriage affecting straight marriage dismissed so coldly. It won't let me load the text anymore, but there was something to the effect of "Proposition 8 concerns only the right of certain couples to marry; because it does not provide for any other rights for any other people, striking it down cannot deprive those other people of any rights."
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

May 2018

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930 31  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 06:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios