religious hypothetical
Apr. 2nd, 2005 11:19 amWhat would happen in the Catholic church if the Pope lost all higher brain function, was still able to breathe on his own but had to rely on a feeding tube to survive?
(Note: better minds than yours have already asked "what's the difference?" so don't even bother to go there.)
I can't possibly imagine that anyone would make the decision to take him off life support. But who would run the place? Is there such a thing as Acting Pope? How does the chain of command work?
(Note: better minds than yours have already asked "what's the difference?" so don't even bother to go there.)
I can't possibly imagine that anyone would make the decision to take him off life support. But who would run the place? Is there such a thing as Acting Pope? How does the chain of command work?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 04:35 pm (UTC)Great minds apparently not only think alike but in synch. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 05:00 pm (UTC)Meanwhile, the one true Schavio faction would ensconce themselves outside a hospice in Naples (ever notice how Florida and Italy are the same shape?). They would be slaughtered like lambs in a misunderstanding with the new reformed anglicans.
Oh, and remember, The talse pope is always the French one.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 05:40 pm (UTC)If he didn't leave behind such a note, if he somehow got in a Terri Schiavo situation, I suspect he'd be quietly poisoned and we'd be told he had a "heart attack" or something like that. There is no acting pope, his responsibilities and power devolve to no one.
All of that said, look at what has been happening: last time he departed the hospital, his spokesman said he would not be returning. So, they'd clearly already decided that he was returning to the vatican to die. By keeping him there, they (and by they I include the pope and his wishes) can ensure that he simply can't get any procedures or equipment that could put him in such a situation, so the dilemma can't arise.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 05:47 pm (UTC)No, wait...
[snork]
Consistency and outright stubborn ignroant pigheadedness are not necessarily the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 06:28 pm (UTC)Yes. From what I've read (and it's plausible based on other things I know), aggressive medical intervention could keep him alive somewhat longer -- maybe just a day or two, maybe more.
But the Pope has apparently decided to let himself die sooner rather than later.
So much for the admonitions to "choose life" always, under any condition. I've never accepted the idea that life is always better than the alternative. But it's interesting to see the Pope making the same judgment.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 08:11 pm (UTC)I don't know Catholisism but...
Date: 2005-04-02 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 08:48 pm (UTC)This sentence needs a touch of editorial work In past centuries, popes sometimes delegated authority to Vatican officials who were "nephews" or other relatives.
Re: I don't know Catholisism but...
Date: 2005-04-02 08:53 pm (UTC)Popes can speak ex cathedra (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_cathedra), although, so far, it's only been done 5 times and the promulgtion of the doctrine itself, in 1870, was one of them.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 09:02 pm (UTC)Resignation is a possibility, but it has to be freely made by the Pope in question.
Re: I don't know Catholisism but...
Date: 2005-04-02 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 09:51 pm (UTC)Just think: they actually keep a gold hammer around just to bean dying popes with. Remarkable.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 11:12 pm (UTC)I've thought about these issues a lot, not least when my (atheist) grandfather was dying in a (Catholic) continuing care home, and we could not get him adequate pain control because the doctors and nurses were concerned that higher doses might speed his death. He had decided to refuse water after a massive stroke, so there was no chance he would survive for long. I held his hand for much of those eight days. I remember vividly when he was in great pain, and I had to explain to him why he had to wait two more hours for another dose of morphine. In my view, it would have been much more merciful to give him painkillers whenever he asked for them (using signals from the one hand that could still move), even if that meant that his life was shortened by two or three days.
I see the political rhetoric of "choose life" as willfully blind to such complexities -- as heartless at best, and often cruel in its results.
And so I am interested when the Pope makes the same sort of choice I can imagine wanting to make in his circumstances -- to return to my home, receive good palliative care, and die in peace. I hope that, if I end up in similar circumstances, I will be able to make and enforce the same choice, but American politics makes me think it unlikely.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-03 01:57 am (UTC)In addition to telling anyone who happens to be nearby when I think of it that I want to be unplugged, I should remember to tell those making such decisions NOT to take me to a Catholic hospital. *I* want to make these decisions for myself, based on *my* ethics system.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-03 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-03 04:16 am (UTC)the holy catholic church
Date: 2006-01-09 11:35 pm (UTC)Re: the holy catholic church
Date: 2006-01-10 09:16 pm (UTC)