topaz: (2632)
Tim Pierce ([personal profile] topaz) wrote2005-10-06 12:03 pm
Entry tags:

torture supporters in the Senate

The McCain-Graham anti-torture amendment passed the Senate last night by a startling 90-9 margin.  Curiously, none of the articles I saw listed the nine senators who voted to continue torturing detainees.

Fortunately, senate.gov did post a roll call:

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00249

Wayne Allard (R-CO)
Christopher Bond (R-MO)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
James Inhofe (R-OK)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Ted Stevens (R-AK)

[identity profile] dilletante.livejournal.com 2005-10-06 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
which makes the actions of the senators who voted against it even more entertaining.

"i knew this would never make it into law, but it's important to take a stand for torture on principle."
drwex: (Default)

[personal profile] drwex 2005-10-07 01:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't checked, but I'd bet decent money that none of those who voted for torture are up for reelection. By the time they are they can depend on the voters' short memories not to hold it against them.

[identity profile] dilletante.livejournal.com 2005-10-07 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
even if the populace forgets you voted for torture, your opponent will remind them.

and even if he didn't-- this presupposes there's actually a good reason to vote against this bill. what would such a reason be?