torture supporters in the Senate
Oct. 6th, 2005 12:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The McCain-Graham anti-torture amendment passed the Senate last night by a startling 90-9 margin. Curiously, none of the articles I saw listed the nine senators who voted to continue torturing detainees.
Fortunately, senate.gov did post a roll call:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00249
Wayne Allard (R-CO)
Christopher Bond (R-MO)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
James Inhofe (R-OK)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Ted Stevens (R-AK)
Fortunately, senate.gov did post a roll call:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00249
Wayne Allard (R-CO)
Christopher Bond (R-MO)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
James Inhofe (R-OK)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Ted Stevens (R-AK)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:21 pm (UTC)Couldn't find anything that said whether it was strategic or family-member-having-surgery-ish.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:18 pm (UTC)Objectively pro-torture
Date: 2005-10-06 04:20 pm (UTC)Re: Objectively pro-torture
Date: 2005-10-06 05:42 pm (UTC)Did those who voted against ever serve in the military? I know Jeff Sessions is a joke (so incompetent a lawyer that when Reagan nominated him to the Federal bench, his own senator (Heflin) risked his seat to vote nay), what about the rest?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 09:41 pm (UTC)"i knew this would never make it into law, but it's important to take a stand for torture on principle."
no subject
Date: 2005-10-07 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-07 02:28 pm (UTC)and even if he didn't-- this presupposes there's actually a good reason to vote against this bill. what would such a reason be?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 05:48 pm (UTC)What the amendment says is "follow the goddamn manual you already wrote." It doesn't call for writing any new manuals.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 11:11 pm (UTC)