torture supporters in the Senate
Oct. 6th, 2005 12:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The McCain-Graham anti-torture amendment passed the Senate last night by a startling 90-9 margin. Curiously, none of the articles I saw listed the nine senators who voted to continue torturing detainees.
Fortunately, senate.gov did post a roll call:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00249
Wayne Allard (R-CO)
Christopher Bond (R-MO)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
James Inhofe (R-OK)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Ted Stevens (R-AK)
Fortunately, senate.gov did post a roll call:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00249
Wayne Allard (R-CO)
Christopher Bond (R-MO)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
James Inhofe (R-OK)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Ted Stevens (R-AK)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 09:41 pm (UTC)"i knew this would never make it into law, but it's important to take a stand for torture on principle."
no subject
Date: 2005-10-07 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-07 02:28 pm (UTC)and even if he didn't-- this presupposes there's actually a good reason to vote against this bill. what would such a reason be?