For the love of God, people, can we drop this nonsense about how maybe Trig Palin is really Sarah Palin's granddaughter? Christ on a crutch. This story is so stupid it makes the "Barack Obama in a limousine with cocaine and gay hookers" line sound like an NPR report.
At the moment the Democrats are not, for once, the dumbest party in the country. Let us please keep it that way for another few months. Thank you.
At the moment the Democrats are not, for once, the dumbest party in the country. Let us please keep it that way for another few months. Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 10:49 pm (UTC)Between the photos of Sarah, the photos of Bristol, Bristol being out of school with "mono" for a bizarrely long time, the seemingly insane decision to get on an eight-hour flight after contractions started... you can't tell me there's not some reasonable doubt there.
And between Palin's views on sex education (because abstinence-only programs "work"!) and the campaign proudly trotting out the decision not to abort Trig, you can't say it's not relevant.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:03 am (UTC)Personally I don't care either way, except to hope the child was conceived in trigonometry class.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:26 am (UTC)I failed so spectacularly in the application that I'm left having to believe one crazy side or another, which leaves me somehow still dubious about the current pregnancy. If the daughter's not pregnant, it's a great refutation of the story, and the kids can get married and raise the kid after the "miscarriage" which ends the current non-pregnancy. It's crazy, but no crazier than either thing I was considering before, and one of those had to have been true.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:37 am (UTC)The bit about getting on a plane after her water broke is also telling, but I think in the opposite way. If the whole pregnancy was a put-on in the first place, why on earth would she concoct such an odd and easily attacked reason for getting on a plane to come home? Why would her handlers not simply say "a family matter" or even "cut short for urgent state business"? It really strikes me as more plausible that the stated reason, while unusual, was the real deal.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:07 am (UTC)But on the "it's not her kid" side of the razor the "Daughter is always holding New Baby, because it's hers" now has a looking-glass analogue in "Daughter is always holding New Baby to hide her own baby bump."
Oh, wait, your post was about how we're not supposed to be dignifying this. Dammit.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:51 am (UTC)I can accept "more plausible", I can accept "less crazy", but "way way way less crazy" is a stretch. :P I'm with
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:00 pm (UTC)This story came out, presumably, because someone who knew about it leaked it. Why haven't any of the stories we've seen cited that source? Not even on deep background?
Here's what I think Occam's Razor tells us. Someone got wind that Palin's daughter is pregnant. After that story got told to a friend of a friend of a friend, it turned into the two rumors that hit the net: "Palin pretended to be pregnant to cover up her daughter's pregnancy" and "Palin is pregnant again."
That's all I see here. Honestly, my worst fear is that Palin will call the skeptics' bluff and tell her doctor to release her medical records. In minutes, it would turn the story into one about how the Democrats are losing it and grasping at straws. And isn't that all we need right now.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 10:12 pm (UTC)As for sources, the initial posts I saw about the story were from random celebrity/gossip blogs. Sarah doesn't look pregnant, but Bristol does, huh, connect the dots. No sources, just looking at photos, the info about mono and flights came later.