Google Biking
Mar. 10th, 2010 11:10 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Google Maps gets biking directions: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/biking-directions-added-to-google-maps.html
Dark green routes are dedicated bike trails and sidepaths; light green are bike lanes, and dashed green lines are "recommended" roads for biking.
I haven't explored it much yet to see what I think of the actual routes it suggests. It seems to recommend bike paths and lanes strongly over other roads, which is fine, but of course it can't really take things like road surface quality into account.
Dark green routes are dedicated bike trails and sidepaths; light green are bike lanes, and dashed green lines are "recommended" roads for biking.
I haven't explored it much yet to see what I think of the actual routes it suggests. It seems to recommend bike paths and lanes strongly over other roads, which is fine, but of course it can't really take things like road surface quality into account.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-10 06:45 pm (UTC)Unfortunately for me, it can't actually create bike routes where there really aren't any. The shortest path to the close Mexican place for me is on a busy and fast road through the middle of a freeway cloverleaf. Google, can you fix that?
More seriously, to the local coffeeshop it recommends taking the bigger surface street instead of the small winding streets. Hills may play a role in that too. For my comfort factor, I take the side streets with the hills every single time.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-10 07:03 pm (UTC)Getting quality data about roads is a big problem. There is no systematic data source for pavement quality, and even the information about where hills are is full of noise.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-10 07:15 pm (UTC)Pavement quality is going to be a rough one in general, since it's going to vary over time. Columbus is spending a *lot* on pothole repair right now.
and even the information about where hills are is full of noise.
*sings* The hills are alive, with the sound ... oh, nevermind.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 08:01 pm (UTC)