Kinsey and Million Dollar Baby
Feb. 4th, 2005 11:47 amHave been catching up on my movie viewing.
On Tuesday, got to see Kinsey and had a very nice, long dinner and evening stroll with the always fascinating
psongster. The movie was very nicely done: I had problems with some of the characterizations (like Kinsey's father) but it was very well acted. In particular I liked the fact that while it didn't shy away from Kinsey's problems and the shortcomings of his methodology, it also didn't demonize him for them. Given that it was ultimately a very favorable portrait I thought it was as neutral as it could possibly be, given how polarized the subject matter was.
Last night I saw Million Dollar Baby. What a movie. Anyone who considers themselves a student of writing should see this one. The script is deceptively complex -- deceptive because it seems, when you are watching it, like a very simple, straightforward story, but the more you think about it, you will find layer upon layer of meaning that you had not noticed before. The stories fit together so neatly and so beautifully that you can't imagine them being told any other way. Lots of critics named Sideways the best picture of the year, and while I think I enjoyed the time I spent watching Sideways more, I can't say that it was the better film. The craft of Million Dollar Baby was so remarkable that even thinking about it now it takes my breath away.
Still want to see The Aviator and Rwanda, and Assassination and Aquatic before they leave the theaters. And Neverland if I can get
keyne to go with me before the Oscars.
On Tuesday, got to see Kinsey and had a very nice, long dinner and evening stroll with the always fascinating
Last night I saw Million Dollar Baby. What a movie. Anyone who considers themselves a student of writing should see this one. The script is deceptively complex -- deceptive because it seems, when you are watching it, like a very simple, straightforward story, but the more you think about it, you will find layer upon layer of meaning that you had not noticed before. The stories fit together so neatly and so beautifully that you can't imagine them being told any other way. Lots of critics named Sideways the best picture of the year, and while I think I enjoyed the time I spent watching Sideways more, I can't say that it was the better film. The craft of Million Dollar Baby was so remarkable that even thinking about it now it takes my breath away.
Still want to see The Aviator and Rwanda, and Assassination and Aquatic before they leave the theaters. And Neverland if I can get
no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 07:09 pm (UTC)I'm interested that you found the portrayal of Kinsey's father problematic. Why? The character seemed all too plausible to me. I still haven't read a Kinsey bio, but I've read some reviews, and that isn't one of the inconsistencies they suggest.
Do let me know if you want a companion for others of your movie-explorations. Recently I've been averaging slightly under one movie a year, and I wouldn't mind increasing that rate.
And thank you for the compliment :-).
no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 07:37 pm (UTC)I like flawed characters -- people who are troubled or troublesome in some deep way, but still show you their basic humanity. Neeson portrayed Kinsey very, very well in that way. But his father was really a caricature -- I found no depth beyond his bluster. That what seemed less satisfying about it to me.
And I will definitely give you a holler in the future when I'm planning to go to a movie and am looking for company. :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 08:43 pm (UTC)This pattern is frustrating if I think of the movie as a piece of literature, which somewhat lacks internal unity. But I find it more thought-provoking than bothersome when I think of the movie as a reflection on history (*not* a historical source in itself, but the filmmakers' attempt to grapple with the recent past).
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 04:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 02:32 am (UTC)As for Million Dollar Baby, the issue, I think, is that no matter what Eastwood does, many people still see Dirty Harry and the Man with No Name, whether in front of the camera or behind it. He's very much the Fred Astaire of serious non-indy filmmaking these days: great craft that is distinguished even further by its invisibility.
I'd love to know what country is Eastwood's equivalence of Jerry Lewis' France.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 03:55 am (UTC)