Entry tags:
torture supporters in the Senate
The McCain-Graham anti-torture amendment passed the Senate last night by a startling 90-9 margin. Curiously, none of the articles I saw listed the nine senators who voted to continue torturing detainees.
Fortunately, senate.gov did post a roll call:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00249
Wayne Allard (R-CO)
Christopher Bond (R-MO)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
James Inhofe (R-OK)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Ted Stevens (R-AK)
Fortunately, senate.gov did post a roll call:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00249
Wayne Allard (R-CO)
Christopher Bond (R-MO)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
James Inhofe (R-OK)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Ted Stevens (R-AK)
no subject
no subject
Couldn't find anything that said whether it was strategic or family-member-having-surgery-ish.
no subject
Objectively pro-torture
Re: Objectively pro-torture
Did those who voted against ever serve in the military? I know Jeff Sessions is a joke (so incompetent a lawyer that when Reagan nominated him to the Federal bench, his own senator (Heflin) risked his seat to vote nay), what about the rest?
no subject
no subject
no subject
"i knew this would never make it into law, but it's important to take a stand for torture on principle."
no subject
no subject
and even if he didn't-- this presupposes there's actually a good reason to vote against this bill. what would such a reason be?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
What the amendment says is "follow the goddamn manual you already wrote." It doesn't call for writing any new manuals.
no subject
no subject