immigration
May. 1st, 2006 04:05 pmSo I don't understand the big ruckus over immigration.
Specifically, I don't understand why immigration is restricted. I don't understand why we perceive a need to have a category of "illegal immigrants" at all, why we don't classify anyone who comes to this country as a potential citizen if they pass all of the appropriate tests, and a non-citizen resident until then.
I understand the problems with having a large number of aliens who place a burden on public resources and don't contribute to the tax pool. But it seems like a problem that would be more effectively addressed by taxing resident aliens than by trying to block them from coming here to live at all.
Anyway, happy immigration protest day to everyone!
Specifically, I don't understand why immigration is restricted. I don't understand why we perceive a need to have a category of "illegal immigrants" at all, why we don't classify anyone who comes to this country as a potential citizen if they pass all of the appropriate tests, and a non-citizen resident until then.
I understand the problems with having a large number of aliens who place a burden on public resources and don't contribute to the tax pool. But it seems like a problem that would be more effectively addressed by taxing resident aliens than by trying to block them from coming here to live at all.
Anyway, happy immigration protest day to everyone!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 04:40 pm (UTC)French citizenship notwithstanding, it is also important to realize that other ideas that are being floated here in the U.S. (though, thankfully, not yet in Congress) are denying health care to illegal immigrants and denying their children public schooling (http://immigration.about.com/od/ussocialeconomicissues/i/EduIllegalIss.htm); creating an even-less-educated, unhealthy population is a straight road to the Paris riots, and denying American-born people citizenship will only exacerbate it.
As far as why I think this is a racial issue - because right now the issue is with Mexicans. Sure, immigration hasn't been completely sorted out with regards to people from other countries, but the reason it's a hot issue is people from Mexico & the rest of Central America.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 01:22 am (UTC)The thinking was that people who, by jus sanguis, were citizens of another nation could move there.
I think that, while some people are obviously motivated by racial animus, the core problems would be there if, say, we swapped Mexico for a comparable, non-Hispanic country with high corruption, low social mobility and a poor economy: Ukraine, say. (You are right that the overwhelming majority of our illegal immigration comes from Latin America, and in particlar from Mexico {Mexicans are a majority of our illegal population}, but I think that's due mainly to lousy conditions in those countries-we'd be getting a crapload of Canadians if Canada were ruled by a corrupt kleptocracy) I also think that this problem would be ameriolated if we overhauled our immigration system to make legal immigration (whether aimed at eventual citizenship or permanent residency) easier.