Heh, no -- the color and the focus is just off a bit because it was about 7:30 in the evening and the light was fading, and my 8-year-old digicam doesn't do quite so well in low light. :-)
Aw, I didn't mean it as a slam. It's an adorable photo. :) It is, as you say, a little bit off, but not as MUCH off as I'd have expected, and so it was eye-catching.
Ahh, I didn't take it that way at all. I can understand why you'd wonder if it was a phonecam shot -- I have seen some scarily high-quality phonecam pictures. :-)
'course, just wait another year or so and the phones will have caught up to the technology in this camera :-)
(I actually *do* want a site that compares the cameras in different phones, like a dbreview.com (http://dpreview.com/) kind of thing, since it is the feature that's actually most important to me after reception. Everything I've seen of that sort has ben half-assed, though.)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 01:10 am (UTC)'course, just wait another year or so and the phones will have caught up to the technology in this camera :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 01:16 am (UTC)(I actually *do* want a site that compares the cameras in different phones, like a dbreview.com (http://dpreview.com/) kind of thing, since it is the feature that's actually most important to me after reception. Everything I've seen of that sort has ben half-assed, though.)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 01:22 am (UTC)Hey. I sense.... a Project in the making.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 01:23 am (UTC)